HOME  

The Yahushaic Covenant Volume 1

 

 

Excerpt from

The Yahushaic Covenant Volume 1
by Rav Sha'ul

Buy Now button
Logos and the Firstborn of Creation
by Rav Sha'ul

 

Yahusha is called the firstborn of Creation.  Does this mean that Yahusha was created and existed prior to his human birth?  To understand this title for Yahusha we must use Wisdom and Insight and overcome the pagan philosophy of “Logos” and the physical to spiritual parallel of “light”.

It is imperative that we all know what happened when Greeks and Romans took over the faith.  We know the Greeks did not understand scripture and twisted it into a lie:

1 Corinthians 1

20 Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this age? Has not Yahuah made foolish the wisdom of this world? 21 For since, in the wisdom of Yahuah, the world (the Roman Empire) through wisdom did not know Yahuah, it pleased Yahuah through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. 22 For Jews request a sign, and Greeks seek after wisdom (through philosophy); 23 but we preach the Passover sacrifice of Yahusha, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness, 24 but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, the Messiah is the power of Yahuah and the wisdom of Yahuah. 25 Because the foolishness of Yahuah is wiser than men, and the weakness of Yahuah (if there is such a thing) is stronger than men.

2 Peter 3

14 Therefore, beloved, looking forward to these things, be diligent to be found by Him in peace, without spot and blameless; 15 and consider that the longsuffering of our King is salvation—as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, 16 as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.

We say that the Hebrew texts and the Gospel and all the Hebrew names were “Hellenized” not realizing what that means.  That word does not just mean the Hebrew texts were translated into Greek and Latin.  What Hellenized literally means is that the polytheistic religion of the Greeks was merged into the texts and the text altered to be “Greek appropriate” so the pagans could be assimilated into the one world religion called Christianity.  Hellenism is Greek paganism.  Everyone should fully understand what happened during this time in history.  The Truth of Yahuah was merged with pagan Hellenism through syncretism.  We see below that nothing changed with Hellenism and that the same gods continued to be worshipped until 300 CE.  This is when Constantine brought everything under one pagan religion called Christianity:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellenistic_religion

Hellenistic religion

Hellenistic religion is any of the various systems of beliefs and practices of the people who lived under the influence of ancient Greek culture during the Hellenistic period and the Roman Empire (c. 300 BCE to 300 CE). There was much continuity in Hellenistic religion: the Greek gods continued to be worshipped, and the same rites were practiced as before.

We call this assimilation of Greek Hellenism to be Hellenized.  We know that the pagan Greek religion (Hellenism) overtook the truth of Yahuah and the resulting religion is now called Christianity:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellenization

Hellenization

The twentieth century witnessed a lively debate over the extent of Hellenization in the Levant and particularly among the ancient Palestinian Jews that has continued until today. The Judaism of the diaspora was thought to have succumbed thoroughly to its influences. Bultmann thus argued that Christianity arose almost completely within those Hellenistic confines and should be read against that background as opposed to a more traditional (Palestinian) Jewish background

I want to firmly establish this historical fact because “Logos” was one of those philosophical ideas of Hellenism that was incorporated into the texts and the texts were altered by the Greek and Hellenized Jews who translated it.

In order to justify the false doctrine of “pre-existence” or the “incarnation” that Yahusha pre-existed with Yahuah and was co-creator, Christianity quotes John Chapter 1:

John 1

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.

6 There was a man sent from God whose name was John. 7 He came as a witness to testify concerning that light, so that through him all might believe. 8 He himself was not the light; he came only as a witness to the light.

9 The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. 11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God.

14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

15 (John testified concerning him. He cried out, saying, “This is the one I spoke about when I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’”) 16 Out of his fullness we have all received grace in place of grace already given. 17 For The Law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. 18 No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known.

All the modern translation like the NIV above are uninspired Hellenized translations giving preference to Greek mythology not the Hebrew mindset. Let us define terms and then correct the modern Hellenized translations with the intent and mindset of John who was a Hebrew Jew not a Greek philosopher.  First a quick note on the use of "sound bites" to create doctrine.

"Sound Bites" vs. Sound Teaching

The doctrine of “pre-existence”, “Logos”, and the “Incarnation” are very good examples of taking scripture out of context.  Taking scriptural “sound bites” and stringing them all together out of context to create an implied doctrine.  These doctrines are always easy to identify because they violate clear explicate doctrine (sound doctrine).  Anytime an implied doctrine is formulated that contradicts explicit scriptures we must reject that doctrine as our “understanding” is flawed.

Let's look closer at how the doctrine evolved that Yahusha is literally the "Word" or “Divine Logos” of Yahuah that became flesh used to justify incarnation. Is Yahusha literally the "Word" or is Yahusha the fulfillment of Yahuah's Word from the beginning. There is a big difference.

Logos a pagan philosophy

As you can see, the entire doctrine of incarnation that lead to the acceptance of the pagan Babylonian Trinity through syncretism did not come about until 4 centuries after Yahusha lived and died.  That false doctrine that Yahusha is literally "Logos" and not the fulfillment of Yahuah's predestined plan evolved in the 4th Century through the "tradition and reasoning" under the influence of pagan Greek philosophers such as Plato...

The Abingdon Dictionary of Living Religions, page 767, tells us:

TRINITY (Ch). The Dogma, formulated authoritatively in fourth century church Councils, that Christians worship one God in three persons (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) and one substance. Under pressure to explain to a hostile Roman world how Christians counted themselves monotheists, Christian apologists (notably Justin Martyr, d. 165) combined Johannine and Stoic-Platonic understanding of the term Logos ("Reason," or "Word") in order to maintain that the Son was both God's own self-expression and a being distinct from him.

So we read above The Trinity was justified not through the Word of Yahuah (because it cannot be) it was justified using Hellenism or the “combined Johannine and Stoic Platonic” pagan philosophy of the term “Logos”.

We read below that the term logos was defined by Christians according to the interpretations of pagan influenced philosophers in order to promote a false pagan God-savior:

Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 7, page 449:

LOGOS (Greek:"word, "reason, or plan"), plural logoi, in Greek philosophy and theology, the divine reason implicit in the cosmos, ordering it and giving it form and meaning. Though the concept defined by the term logos is found in Greek, Indian, Egyptian, and Persian philosophical and theological systems, it became particularly significant in Christian writings and doctrines to describe or define the role of Jesus Christ as the principle of God active in the creation and the continuation structuring of the cosmos and in revealing the divine plan of salvation to man. It thus underlies the basic Christian doctrine of the pre-existence of Jesus The identification of Jesus with the logos was further developed in the early church but more on the basis of Greek philosophical ideas than on Old Testament motifs.

The concept of Logos was based on Greek philosophical ideas not on any prophecy or Old Testament “motifs” or Hebrew understanding at all.  It is and remains a pagan philosophy of Hellenism. 

The Religions of Ancient Greece and Babylonia clearly tells us that the Greek philosophical ideas were developed in Alexandria, Egypt from the pagan Babylonian mystery religions. These ideas pertaining to the meaning of Logos penetrated as a result of modern religious thought through the philosophy of Greece and Egypt.  It was through syncretism that we have the word “Logos” or “Word” written in our English Bibles instead of “The Plan of Yahuah”:

The Religions of Ancient Greece and Babylonia, by A. H. Sayce. pages 229-230

Many of the theories of Egyptian religion, modified and transformed no doubt, have penetrated into the theology of Christian Europe, and form, as it were, part of the woof in the web of modern religious thought. Christian theology was largely organized and nurtured in the schools of Alexandria, and Alexandria was not only the meeting place of East and West, it was also the place where the decrepit theology of Egypt was revivified by contact with the speculative philosophy of Greece. Perhaps, however, the indebtedness of Christian theological theory to ancient Egyptian dogma is nowhere more striking than in the doctrine of the Trinity. The very terms used of it by Christian theologians meet us again in the inscriptions and papyri of Egypt. Originally the trinity was a triad like those we find in Babylonian mythology. The triad consisted of a divine father, wife, and son. The father became the son and the son the father through all time, and of both alike the mother was but another form.

It is from the pagan mystery religions that the Greek philosophers developed the idea of Logos:

The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Volume 3, page 1085

Among the systems offering an explanation of the world in terms of the logos, there are the Mystery Religions. These cultic communities did not see their task as lying in the communication of knowledge of a scientific nature, but of mysteries to their initiates who strove for purification in the recurrent enactment of sacred actions. The Foundation for these cultic actions was Sacred Text. Among them were the cults of Dionysus, the Pytha-goreans, and the Orphic Mysteries. By means of these cults, non Greek thought, such as in the Isis-Osiris Mysteries, which Osiris the logos created by Isis is the spiritual image of the world. Similarly in the cult of Hermes, Hermes informed his son Tat in the Sacred Text belonging to the cult, how by God's mercy, he became logos, and thus a son of God. As such, he (Hermes) brought regulation and form into world, but himself remained a mediating being between God and matter, on one side, and God and man on the other. The logos can also, however, appear as the son of Hermes, resulting in a triple (trinity) gradation: God (who is Zeus), Son (Hermes), and LOGOS.

Now back to John Chapter 1 where this pagan philosophy of “Logos” was mistranslated into our English Bibles by uninspired Hellenized translators. 

John 1

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.

The word “word in these verses comes from the Greek word logos. The Christians, so eager to promote the pagan Trinity, attached to the word every pagan interpretation. But they deliberately ignore the fact that John was a Hebrew Jew who had nothing to do with pagan Greek philosophy and the Gospel of John was not written from the pagan mindset associated with the Greek work logos.  The Gospel of John was written from a Hebraic mindset and most probably penned originally in Hebrew not Greek.

The Wycliffe Bible Encyclopedia, Moody Press, Chicago, IL, Volume 2 pages 1046-1047.

Many scholars have argued that the apostle John had this philosophical development (of the pagan LOGOS) in the back of his mind when he wrote the prologue to his Gospel and that he actually tried to impart some of these (pagan) concepts. For a long time many have contended that the background of the fourth Gospel was essentially Hellenistic rather than Hebraic. In dealing with such an assertion we may note that studies in the Dead Sea scrolls have tended to confirm the traditional conservative position that the cultural orientation of the Gospel of John was Hebraic. Moreover, we must observe that John was a simple fisherman from Palestine. … there is no evidence that he imbibed any Greek pagan philosophical orientation in John Chapter 1. If he intended to be philosophical in the first few verses, he certainly was not anywhere else. We may argue that John used the word "logos." in its ordinary meaning.

This source admits that John used this word in its ordinary meaning in the Hebraic mindset. They further admit that John's writings were Hebraic not Greek which means the actual word John used was the Hebrew word dabar not the Greek word logos.

The Encyclopedia Judaica admits that the style of most of the writings in The New Testament is, in fact, Hebraic.  The Greek versions we have today of The New Testament are later Hellenized versions translated from earlier Hebrew original versions that were most likely burned after the council of Nicea.  So “logos” is a mistranslation; the original version of John Chapter 1 used the Hebrew word debar.

The Encyclopedia Judaica, Volume 12, page 1060

THE LANGUAGE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT.

Although the language of the New Testament, in the form that it exists today, is Greek, two earlier influences are still discernible.

(1) THE INFLUENCE OF THE ARAMAIC-HEBREW ORIGINALS.  Because most of the authors were Jewish Nazarenes, they spoke, for the most part, Aramaic, and some also mishnaic Hebrew. This influence, which was detectable particularly in the original versions of Mark and Matthew, survives to some degree in their extant Greek versions and in several of the Epistles as well, including James and Jude.

(2) THE SEPTUAGINT.
Since this translation was used by many authors, the New Testament contains not only Aramaic words and phrases, which the disciples heard from Jesus and took care to remember out of reverence for their master (e.g. Talitha Kumi (Mark 5:41), Kum, Rabboni, Eli, Eli (Elohi, Elohi) lama sabachthani (Matt. 27:46; Mark 15:24)), but also expressions and phrases which retain their Hebrew flavor although they were transmitted through the Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible.

So, John wrote under inspiration of Yahuah, not of a pre-existent God-savior, but of the wonderful Plan of Yahuah which is what the Hebrew word debar implies. The Anchor Bible shows us from the Talmud that seven things were in Yahuah's mind showing us what the Hebraic mindset was.  His Plan was from the beginning and this plan included the Savior.  This is the mindset of John Chapter 1 not the pagan philosophy of “Logos”:

The Anchor Bible, Ephesians 1-3, page 111

IN THE TALMUD tractate Pesachim 54a; cf. Nedarim 39b, seven things, i.e. the law, repentance, paradise, Gehinnom, the throne of glory, the heavenly sanctuary, and the messiah are not called pre-created, but pre-conceived in (Yahuah's) thoughts.

Debar vs. Logos

The Gospel of John was originally written in Hebrew then Hellenized into a Greek appropriate book in order to assimilate pagan religions through syncretism.  The Hebrew word used in John Chapter 1 was debar. A Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament shows us that the Hebrew word dabar refers to Yahuah's Plan and His Laws.

A Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament, by Julius Furst, page 312

dabar

The Interpreter's Dictionary states emphatically that “word” or “logos” or “debar’ as used in The Bible is referring to “Yahuah’s revealed will or predestined Plan” for mankind.  Speaking of the debar i.e. “word” of Yahuah, The Interpreter's Dictionary states emphatically

The Interpreter's Dictionary , Volulme 4 pages 870-871

"The word of God" (o logof tou qeou) is used of:

(a) the OT law (cf. Mark 7:13=Matt 15:6, where it is contrasted with the tradition of the Jews);

(b) a particular OT passage (cf. John 10:35, referring to Ps. 82:6);

(c) in a more general sense, God's revealed will, or his whole plan and purpose for mankind (cf. Luke 11:28; Rom. 9:6; Col. 1:25-27, where it is defined as the "mystery hidden for ages and generations but now manifest to his saints..., which is Christ in you"; Heb. 4:12);

The real meaning of John Chapter 1

What we have learned above is that our English Bibles are modern Hellenized uninspired translations that Hellenized the original Hebraic mindset of the New Testament and promoted pagan philosophical thought.  The way John Chapter 1 is translated into English embodies the pagan philosophical ideas from Babylon contained in the Greek word “Logos”.  The real meaning of “word” in John Chapter 1 can be found in the Hebrew word “debar” which means the predestined Plan of Yahuah.

What John had in mind was not the pre-existence of Yahusha, but the pre-conceived Plan of Yahuah. This is the polar opposite of how John 1 is taught today. With all this in mind, let us read the correct translation of the following Scripture.

John 1

1 In the beginning was the plan of Yahuah, and the plan was with Yahuah (and defined His purpose in creation), and the plan was Yahuah's. 2 The same plan was in the beginning with Yahuah. 3 All things were done according to the plan of Yahuah, and without the plan of Yahuah nothing was done, that was done. 4 In this plan was (predestined) life (through a human Messiah’s sacrifice), and that life was the light (revelation) to mankind. 5 Now that light (revealed plan to send a human Messiah has been fulfilled in Yahusha) shines in the darkness, but the darkness does not take hold of it. 6 There was a man sent from Yahuah whose name was John. 7 He came as a witness to testify concerning that light (that Yahusha was The Passover Lamb of Yahuah), so that through him all might believe (that Yahusha was the fulfillment of that plan to send a human Messiah). 8 He himself was not the light (the Messiah, many believed John the Baptist was the Messiah); he came only as a witness to the light (Yahusha).

9 The true light (Yahusha) that gives light (reveals The WAY) to everyone was coming into the world (as a man). 10 He (Yahusha) was in the world (in the flesh), and though the world was reconciled to Yahuah through him, the world did not recognize him. 11 Yahusha came to that which was his own (the Jews), but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who did receive him (enter into The Yahushaic Covenant), to those who believed in (the covenant that bears) his name (The Yahushaic Covenant), he gave the right to become children of God— 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but begotten of Yahuah (through resurrection).

14 The predestined plan of Yahuah (to send a human Messiah) became flesh (was born human and fulfilled in Yahusha) and made his dwelling among us (was fully human in every way Hebrews 2:17). We have seen Yahuah’s glory (fulfilled in Yahusha), the glory of the one and only (begotten) Son (until the first resurrection), who came from the (predestined mind or plan of the) Father, full of grace (covered the death decrees for our sin) and truth (properly teach The Torah as Moses prophesied of him).

15 (John the Baptist testified concerning him. He cried out, saying, “This is the one I spoke about when I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me (in the Plan of Yahuah and given pre-eminence among the sons of Yahuah Colossians 1:17)’”) 16 Out of his fullness (of obedience to The Law) we have all received grace (his blood covers the death decrees in the Law) in place of grace already given. 17 For The Law (with active decrees or The Law of Sin and Death) was given through Moses; grace (the decrees covered by the blood of the lamb) and truth (The Law of the Spirit that leads to life) came through Yahusha the Messiah. 18 No one has ever seen God (including Yahusha) but (however) the one and only Son (has come as the light to reveal Yahuah to mankind), who is himself the (the perfect human) image of Yahuah (Colossians 1:15He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation”) and is in closest relationship (covenant of marriage, the two shall become one) with the Father, has made Yahuah’s plan (to procreate a family) known to us.

That is the meaning and intent in context of scripture and the Hebraic mindset of John Chapter 1.  Yahusha was not the incarnation of Yahuah in the flesh nor did Yahusha have any hand in creation.  Yahusha is the fulfillment of the Plan of Yahuah to send a human Messiah.  Yahusha was the perfect human image of the invisible God. Yahusha is the Proxy of Yahuah.  Yahusha is the son of the Father and it is no more complicated than that.

John 14

8 Philip said, “King, show us the Father and that will be enough for us.”  9 Yahusha answered: “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the (perfect human image of the invisible) Father.

Colossians 1:15

He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation

How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? 10 Don’t you believe that I am in (covenant with) the Father, and that the Father is in (covenant with) me? The words (of this covenant) I say to you I do not speak on my own authority (I am the proxy or messenger of Yahuah of The Yahushaic Covenant, the SIGNATORY). Rather, it is the Father, living in me (through His Spirit), who is doing his work. 11 Believe me when I say that I am in (covenant with) the Father and the Father is in (covenant with) me.

Yahusha and Yahuah are “one” through covenant.  All covenants in the Bible are marriage covenants.  Within the context of The Yahushaic Covenant, Yahusha and Yahuah are one family (one through marriage) that is what the physical to spiritual parallel of human marriage was designed to teach us.

John 10

25 Yahusha answered them, “I told you (I was the Messiah), and you do not believe. The works that I do in My Father’s name, they bear witness of Me. 26 But you do not believe, because you are not of My sheep, as I said to you. 27 My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow my example. 28 And I give them (The Way to) eternal life (by example), and they shall never perish; neither shall anyone snatch them out of My hand. 29 My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of My Father’s hand. 30 I and My Father are one (family in mind, will, purpose, and Spirit through covenant of Marriage… the two shall become one).”

Yahusha came to fulfill the marriage vows (The Law) which were always the foundation of every marriage covenant:

Jeremiah 3

14 “Return, O backsliding children,” says Yahuah “for I am married to you.”

 

Yahusha’s beginning

Yahusha’s existence began like the existence of all the sons of Yahuah at the point of his human birth to two earthly parents.  Yahusha did not “pre-exist” other than in the mind of Yahuah within the context of the Plan of Yahuah. 

King David spoke prophetically as though Yahusha was doing the talking in:

Psalm 22:9-10

9 But you took Me from My mother's womb, Yahuah! You made Me trust in You, even from My mother's breast.
10 I was cast upon You from My birth; from My mother's womb, You are My Strength.

The word for word Hebrew translation of Psalm 22:9-10, from The NIV Interlinear Hebrew-English Old Testament shows the word from in these Scriptures:


The Dictionary of Old Testament Words for English Readers, says that the Hebrew letter, mem, which has been circled in the previous copy, is prefixed to a substantive, which denotes the preposition.  However, it is The Hebraic Tongue Restored, by Fabre d'Olivet, which tells us what these prepositions mean when the Hebrew letter mem is prefixed.

EXTRACTIVE OR PARTITIVE ARTICLE. __ The movement which this article expresses, with nouns or actions that it modifies, is that by which a noun or an action is taken for the means, for the instrument, by which they are divided in their essence, or drawn from the midst of several other nouns or similar actions. I render it ordinarily by from, out of, by; with, by means of, among, between, etc.

The New World Dictionary of the American Language, Second College Edition, gives a complete definition of the word from in Hebrew mem as beginning at, starting with, out of.

The word translated from in Psalm 22:10, means beginning at, starting with.  Yahusha is prophetically pictured through King David to say that Yahuah was His strength from the beginning, starting with the point Yahusha Messiah was conceived in His mother's womb. Yahuah was Yahusha's strength.  This can only mean one thing: that before Yahusha was in His mother's womb, Yahuah was not His strength, because Yahusha did not yet exist. He had no need of strength. Yahuah was only Yahusha's strength, beginning at, starting with, His mother's womb.

The belief that Yahusha had his beginning in the womb as flesh is The Spirit of Yahuah.  The denial and belief in the incarnation and Trinity is the Spirit of the False Messiah (Jesus Christ) as I demonstrated in my book The Kingdom of Yahuah.

The Spirit of the False Messiah

Anyone who elevates the image of a man known by his monogram 666-as written in Greeki.e. Hesus Horus Krishna (Jesus H. Christ) in their hearts as God above Yahuah will be given over by Yahuah to believe a lie.  That very lie is that The Law has been abolished by the incarnation of God in the image 666-as written in Greekof Jesus H. Christ. 

The Spirit of the False Messiah is anyone who denies that Yahusha was a mere man (came in the flesh):

1 John 4

1 Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from Yahuah, because many false prophets have gone out into the world (claiming to be the incarnation of God). 2 By this you know the Spirit of Yahuah: every spirit that confesses that Messiah Yahusha has come in the flesh (a man) is from Yahuah; 3 and every spirit that does not confess Yahusha has come in the flesh (but says Yahusha is Yahuah or The Trinity) is not from Yahuah; this is the spirit of the antichrist (or False Messiah.  The False Messiah is an image of a man worshipped above Yahuah as God) … 12 No one has seen Yahuah at any time! (Because Yahusha is not Yahuah in the flesh or a demi-god).

Anyone who elevates the false image of Yahusha (known as Jesus) into a God in their heart believing in the incarnation has The Spirit of The False Messiah. 

The Spirit of Error

The Spirit of Error is given to all of those who commit this abomination and elevate the image of Jesus in their hearts as God.  That Spirit of Error is defined as “abolishing the law” i.e. do not keep the commandments of Yahuah.

2 John 7 - Beware of Antichrist Deceivers

7 For many deceivers have gone out into the world who do not confess Yahusha the Messiah as coming in the flesh (but rather confess Jesus is God in the flesh). This is a deceiver and an antichrist. (The Spirit of the False Messiah) 8 Look to yourselves, that we do not lose those things we worked for, but that we may receive a full reward. 9 Whoever transgresses (The Law of Yahuah) and does not abide in the doctrine of the Messiah (that he did not come to abolish The Law) does not have (the Spirit of) Yahuah (they have The Spirit of Error). He who abides in the doctrine of the Messiah (that not one Jot or Tittle of The Law has been abolished) has both the Father and the Son. 10 If anyone comes to you and does not bring this doctrine (but brings a Trinitarian lie and teaches unrighteousness as truth see Romans 1:18 that The Law was abolished), do not receive him into your house nor greet him; 11 for he who greets him shares in his evil deeds (breaking of The Law).

Next: Divine Emanation?  Was Yahusha used in creation?

HOME  

The Sabbatarian Network provides information on the following numbers, words, and combinations of the following numbers, and words, and many more: 1, 2, 7, 15, 24, 40, 616, 666, 144000, Abel, Abib, abominations, abortion, Abraham, Acts, Adam, aggelos, Aish, Alexander Hislop, allegories, altar, analogies, ancient, angel, annual, anoint, anthropomorphisms, anti-messiah, antichrist, apocalypse, Apollo, Apostles, archangel, Ark of The Covenant, arian, Arius, artos, ascension, ascended, Atlas, atonement, aventine, Aviv, azazel, baal, babies, Babylon, Baptist, baptism, barley, The Beast, believer, Ben, Bnei HaMashalim, Bible, billy, birth ,birthday, black madonnas, blasphemy, blood, Boaz, bread, briyth, Brumalia, Cain, calendars, catholic, catholicism, Chagigah, chapter, charity, chosen, Christ, christianity, Christmas, christopaganism, christopagans, church, coins, Commandments, congregations, Consualia, conversion, Corinthians, corrupted, covenant, covert, creation, crooked cross, crucified, crucifix, Crusades, cults, Cupid, Cybele, Dagon, Daniel, Dateline, David, day, death, decalogue, deception, demons, desktop, destruction, Deuteronomy, Devil, Dionysus, divorce, Divx, doctrine, dragon, dusk, ears to hear, Easter, Eden, Elohim, elohym, Emaculate Conception, end, energy, Epheus, epistles, equinox, Espana, The Eternal, Eternal Life, Eternal Flame, Ethanim, Eve, evening, evil, Exodus, eyes to see, Ezekiel, faith, famine, fast, Fat Tuesday, Father, feasts, fertility, few, fig tree, first, flesh, Timothy Freke, fruits, Gamla, Peter Gandy, Garden of Efen, gate, gematria, Genesis, goats, ghost, GOD, good, good and evil, gog, gospel, grace, graham, Greco-Roman, Greek, guides, Halloween, harlot, Hashanah, HaShem, healing, Heaven, hecate, hell, hills, Hindu, history, Holocaust, Holy, Holy Days, holidays, homosexuality, white horse, red horse, black horse, pale horse, horsemen, human, humanize, humanization, hyssop, IDL, IHS, images, injustice, international, Inanna, Inquisition, intent, International, interpret, Invictus, Isaiah, Isar, Isarlaism, Ishtar, Isis, Israel, Iseous, Ishous, Jacob, Jehovah, Jerusalem, New Jerusalem, Jesus, Jewish, Job, John, Jonas, Jonah, Joseph, Josephus, Joshua, Judah, Judaism, Judas, Judges, justice, Kippur, Kings, kosher, kurios, Lamb, lampstands, Laodicea, leavened, Leviticus, life, logos, love, Lucifer, Luke, madonnas, magog, malak, Mardi Gras, marriage, Mark, martyrs, Mary, Mashal Judaism, Matthew, Melchisedec, Melchizedek, Messiah, messianic, metaphors, minister, miracles, monotheistic, full moon, new moon, moon phases, Mithros, monstrance, Moses, Moshe, mother, murder, nativity, nazarene, nazarite, Nazi, neo-pagan, nephesh, New Jerusalem, news, night, Nissan, Noah, Noe, Numbers , nuns, obedience, oil, olive, Opalia, ostensorium, overt, pagan, palatine, parables, paradox, Passover, pastor, Patmos, Paul, Pentecost, people, Pergamum, persecution, Peter, Paul, Philadelphia, Philistine, photos, pictures, plagues, plan, priests, Protestant, pneuma, Pope, prayer, priest, Promise Land, prophecy, prophesy, prophets, Protestant, Psalms, psychology, purification, Ra, rainbow, rapture, recipes, refute, relationships, repent, repentance, Revelations, resurrection, Rhea, righteous, righteousness, Roman, Romans, Rome, Rosh, ruach, Ruth, Sabbado, Sabbatarians, Sabbath, Sabbaths, sacred, sacrifice, saint, Salem, salvation, Samhain, sanctification, sarcophagus, Sardis, Satan, Saturday, Saturnalia, scapegoat, scripture, seals, security, Seed, self, selfcentered, selfish, selfishness, selflessness, seraphim, Seth, seventh, sex, Shabat, Shabbat, shamar, Shaul, shema, sivan, shofar, sin, Smyrna, Sol, Solomon, solstice, soul, Spanish, sperm, Spirit, star, study, Succoth, Sukah, Sukkat, sunset, Sun worship, supper, swastica, symbolism, Tanakh, temple, Teruah, theos, Thessalonians,Thor, Thyatira, Timothy, tishri, tithe, time, tongues, Torah, torture, translated, Tree of Life, trimurty, translations, trinity, trumpets, truth, twilight, unleavened, valentine, Venus, verse, version, Vestal Virgin, virgin, visions, voting, vow, wallpaper, wheat, whore, witnesses, woes, xmas, Y'Shua, Yah, Yahusha, Yahushua, Yahuah, Yehoshua, Yehowah, Yeshua, YHVH, YHWH, Yom, Zeus, and much more.

maillot de foot 2014 Maillot foot Manche Longue ugg australia pas cher adidas f50 bottes ugg pas cher bottes ugg mercurial vapor maillot de foot Maillots de Foot Football T-shirt uggs pas cher ugg pas cher botte ugg pas cher Chaussures de Foot csj